Likely to use
83.3%
Probably + Definitely
Validation Phase
Early User Validation
Survey results below summarize directional feedback from early users.
Negative intent
10%
Probably not + Definitely not
Response distribution
Definitely40%
Probably43.3%
Not sure6.7%
Probably not6.7%
Definitely not3.3%
Results are directional and based on early feedback.
Behavior snapshot
Based on survey responses collected in January 2026.
Plan with multiple apps
76.7%
Respondents currently stitch trips manually.
Need multi-mode routing
83.3%
Journeys require more than one mode at least sometimes.
Manually find fallback routes
73.3%
Users search combinations themselves when no direct option exists.
High recommendation intent
76.7%
Recommendation intent is 4 or 5 out of 5.
What users struggle with
- Manual stitching across multiple apps
- Managing transfers and layovers with uncertain buffer times
- Booking legs on separate platforms for a single journey
- Route uncertainty in 'no direct route' situations
Survey scope
- Travel frequency and route types (metro/non-metro mix)
- How users currently plan and book inter-city trips
- Fallback behavior when no direct option is available
- Top planning frustrations and confidence in chosen routes
- Willingness to use, trust, pay, and recommend a multimodal platform
Selected anonymous feedback
Anonymous survey responses
"I usually keep three tabs open just to plan one trip."
"When there is no direct train, figuring the transfer city takes too long."
"I can find options, but comparing total travel time across apps is painful."
"I need one view for bus + train + flight combinations."
"Layover timing is where most of my plans fail."
"I often drop a trip idea because planning effort is too high."
"Direct routes are easy; indirect routes are confusing."
"I want suggestions when direct flights are too expensive."